Archive for Politics

Malays in Singapore

Extracted from Singapore Straits Times on 10 Aug 2008.

By Nur Dianah Suhaimi (ndianah@sph.com.sg)

As a Malay, I’ve always been told that I have to work twice as hard to prove my worth. When I was younger, I always thought of myself as the quintessential Singaporean. Of my four late grandparents, two were Malay, one was Chinese and one was Indian. This, I concluded, makes me a mix of all the main races in the country. But I later realised that it was not what goes into my blood that matters, but what my identity card says under ‘Race’.

Because my paternal grandfather was of Bugis origin, my IC says I’m Malay. I speak the language at home, learnt it in school, eat the food and a lesser Singaporean than those from other racial groups.

I grew up clueless about the concept of national service because my father was never enlisted. He is Singaporean all right, born and bred here like the rest of the boys born in 1955.
He is not handicapped in any way. He did well in school and participated in sports.

Unlike the rest, however, he entered university immediately after his A levels. He often told me that his schoolmates said he was ‘lucky’ because
he was not called up for national service.

‘What lucky?’ he would tell them. ‘Would you feel lucky if your country doesn’t trust you?’ So I learnt about the rigours of national service from my male cousins. They would describe in vivid detail their training regimes, the terrible food they! were served and the torture inflicted upon them – most of which, I would later realise, were exaggerations.

But one thing these stories had in common was that they all revolved around the Police Academy in Thomson. As I got older, it puzzled me why my Chinese friends constantly referred to NS as ‘army’. In my family and among my Malay friends, being enlisted in the army was like hitting the jackpot. The majority served in the police force because, as is known, the Government was not comfortable with Malay Muslims serving in the army. But there are more of them now.

Throughout my life, my father has always told me that as a Malay, I need to work twice as hard to prove my worth. He said people have the misconception that all Malays are inherently lazy.

I was later to get the exact same advice from a Malay minister in office who is a family friend. When I started work, I realised that the advice rang true, especially because I wear my religion on my head. My professionalism suddenly became an issue. One question I was asked at a job interview was whether I would be willing to enter a nightclub to chase a story. I answered: ‘If it’s part of the job, why not? And you can rest assured I won’t be tempted to have fun.’

When I attend media events, before I can introduce myself, people assume I write for the Malay daily Berita Harian. A male Malay colleague in The Straits Times has the same problem, too.

This makes me wonder if people also assume that all Chinese reporters are from Lianhe Zaobao and Indian reporters from Tamil Murasu.

People also question if I can do stories which require stake-outs in the sleazy lanes of Geylang. They say because of my tudung I will stick out like a sore thumb. So I changed into a baseball cap and a men’s sports
jacket – all borrowed from my husband – when I covered Geylang.

I do not want to be seen as different from the rest just because I dress
differently. I want the same opportunities and the same job challenges.
Beneath the tudung, I, too, have hair and a functioning brain. And if anything, I feel that my tudung has actually helped me secure some difficult interviews.

Newsmakers – of all races – tend to trust me more because I look guai (Hokkien for well-behaved) and thus, they feel, less likely to write critical stuff about them.

Recently, I had a conversation with several colleagues about this essay. I told them I never thought of myself as being particularly patriotic.
One Chinese colleague thought this was unfair. ‘But you got to enjoy free eduation,’ she said.

Sure, for the entire 365 days I spent in Primary 1 in 1989. But my parents paid for my school and university fees for the next 15 years I was studying.

It seems that many Singaporeans do not know that Malays have stopped getting free education since 1990. If I remember clearly, the news made front-page news at that time.

We went on to talk about the Singapore Government’s belief that Malays here would never point a missile at their fellow Muslim neighbours in a war.

I said if not for family ties, I would have no qualms about leaving the country. Someone then remarked that this is why Malays like myself are not trusted. But I answered that this lack of patriotism on my part comes from not being trusted, and for being treated like a potential traitor.

It is not just the NS issue. It is the frustration of explaining t non-Malays that I don’t get special privileges from the Government. It is having to deal with those who question my professionalism because of my religion. It is having people assume, day after day, that you are lowly educated, lazy and poor. It is like being the least favourite child in a family. This child will try to win his parents’ love only for so long.

After a while, he will just be engulfed by disappointment and bitterness.
I also believe that it is this ‘least favourite child’ mentality which makes most Malays defensive and protective of their own kind.

Why do you think Malay families spent hundreds of dollars voting for two Malay boys in the Singapore Idol singing contest? And do you know that Malays who voted for other competitors were frowned upon by the community?

The same happens to me at work. When I write stories which put Malays in a bad light, I am labeled a traitor. A Malay reader once wrote to me to say: ‘I thought a Malay journalist would have more empathy for these unfortunate people than a non-Malay journalist.’

But such is the case when you are a Malay Singaporean. Your life is not just about you, as much as you want it to be. You are made to feel
responsible for the rest of the pack and your actions affect them as well.
If you trip, the entire community falls with you. But if you triumph, it is considered everyone’s success.

When 12-year-old Natasha Nabila hit the headlines last year for her record PSLE aggregate of 294, I was among the thousands of Malays here who celebrated the news. I sent instant messages to my friends on Gmail and chatted excitedly with my Malay colleagues at work.

Suddenly a 12-year-old has become the symbol of hope for the community and a message to the rest that Malays can do it too – and not just in singing competitions.

And just like that, the ‘least favourite child’ in me feels a lot happier.
Each year, come Aug 9, my father, who never had the opportunity to do national service, dutifully hangs two flags at home – one on the front gate and the other by the side gate.

I wonder if putting up two flags is his way of making himself feels like a better-loved child of Singapore.

PERUTUSAN HARI RAYA IDILFITRI (Malay)

Allahuakbar. Allahuakbar. Allahuakbar.
Walillahil hamd.

Alhamdulillah, sebulan Ramadhan telah kita lalui, kini Syawal bakal menjelang.

Para ulama’ mengibaratkan Ramadhan sebagai tarbiyah ruhiyyah, pendidikan jiwa dan rohani agar tunduk kepada Allah SWT dan bebas daripada kekangan nafsu. Pastinya ini akan memperkemaskan lagi proses pembersihan diri dan jiwa, tazkiyah an nafs kerana asas tersebut akan menjamin landasan pembentukan akhlak dan moral peribadi, keluarga dan masyarakat. Andai asas ini lompang, maka penyelewengan dan fasad, yakni kerosakan termasuk dengan menodai faham keadilan dan pembangunan akan berlaku dengan mudah.

Cabaran demi cabaran dihadapi sepanjang Ramadhan dilalui, pastinya sebagai umat yang tawadhuk, Ramadhan sentiasa mengajar kita betapa kesabaran menjadi paksi kepada kejayaan hakiki. Amal ibadat sepanjang Ramadhan janganlah terhenti tatkala Ramadhan melayarkan tirai. Sebagai umat Islam yang bertaqwa, menjadi satu keperluan agar kita terus istiqamah untuk mendepani perjuangan yang bakal mendatang.

Ramadhan yang dilalui telahpun mengajar kita erti kesabaran di dalam menempuh perjuangan yang rencam. Perjuangan ini tidak terhad untuk melawan hawa nafsu semata-mata, sebaliknya ia melampaui sempadan sikap tatkala kita berhadapan dengan pelbagai keadaan yang menyaksikan ketidak adilan berlegar-legar di kalangan masyarakat.

Kemenangan menuntut perjuangan, perjuangan menuntut kesabaran. Sambutlah Eidulfitri dengan penuh keinsafan, dengan tekad untuk merubah Malaysia ke arah sebuah negara yang menjunjung politik madani. Rapatkanlah ukhuwah dengan jalinan silaturrahim, sebagai melengkapi tarbiyah ruhiyyah Ramadhan.

Mudah-mudahan dengan penghayatan dan tazkirah Ramadhan, iltizam kita lebih menebal untuk melakukan perubahan diri dan ummah melalui tazkiyah dan islah.

 Saya mengucapkan Selamat Menyambut Hari Raya Eidulfitri 1429 Hijrah. Minal Aidil Wal Faiziin.

NOOR FIRDAUS BIN ABDUL SAMAD

AKTIVIS POLITIK SINGAPURA

Tribute to JB Jeyaratnam

Mr. JBJ an icon in Singapore opposition politics passed away this morning.

If i could, i would fly the Singapore flag at half mast for the entire week.

Mr. JBJ’s contributions to Singapore will be remembered for eons to come.

At least some old coot thinking that he has outlived his opponent has just received another reminder that his turn will come soon. )

National Service

NATIONAL SERVICE

Introduction

National Service, or army conscription in Singapore, was first introduced in 1967 due to pressing issues such as national security after Singapore’s “forced” independence in 1965. In 1971, the British completely pulled out of Singapore. It has been 41 years since the introduction of NS.

Since then the world and Asia has changed significantly in terms of security and economic arrangements. But has Singapore’s conscription policy kept up with these changes to reflect and cope with the new geopolitical landscape?

First let us review the service that all able-bodied 18-year-old male Singaporeans have to undergo. Basic Military Training, or BMT, is the “boot camp” for all new recruits. This lasts for three months whereupon the soldier then gets posted out to other units for further specialised training.

The conscripts then serve the remainder of their two-year stint polishing up their combat skills. Following the two years of full-time service, NSmen are required (for up to 40 days a year) to serve in a part-tme capacity until they are 50 years old for commissioned officers and 40 for others.

Reduce the two-year full-time service

In an age where warfare has turned to “smart” technology, is it still logical and necessary for Singapore to insist that its National Servicemen undergo 24 months months of active, full-time service? Such a policy is rare among countries that maintain a conscription policy. Below is a list of countries with periods of full-time conscript service:

1.Austria (6 months)
2.Bolivia (12 months)
3.Brazil (9-12 months)
4.Denmark (4-12 months)
5.Estonia (8-11 months)
6.Finland (6-12 months)
7.Germany (9 months)
8.Greece (12 months)
9.Guatemala (12-24 months)
10.Moldavia (12 months)
11.Mongolia (12 months)
12.Paraguay (12-24 months)
13.Poland (9-12 months)
14.Serbia (6 months)
15.Switzerland (18-21 weeks)
16.Taiwan (12 months)
17.Tunisia (12 months)
18.Turkey (12 months)
19.Ukraine (12 months_
20.Uzbekistan (12 months)

From the above data, it can be seen that for all intents and purposes a conscript army training programme need not be as long as the one we have in Singapore. The more advance countries like Austria, Denmark, Germany, Greece, and Switzerland all have full-time services limited to one year and less.

Even Taiwan, which has an identifiable enemy in the form of China, limits its active service to 12 months. Only countries like South Korea and Israel have conscription periods that are longer than Singapore’s. These countries are, however, in a state of war.

Given the situation in Singapore there is no reason why we cannot employ more efficient training methods and reduce full-time NS from the present two-years to twelve months or less.

Reservist training

The current period of reserve training for NS men of up to 40 years old is also a burden on the servicemen and, by extension, the economy. Not only does the serviceman have to contend with the influx of foreigners, they are disadvantaged in terms of employment, remuneration and promotion when employers compare local men who have to be away for weeks in anyone year with foreign workers who have no such obligation.

The span of a serviceman’s reservist training should not go beyond 30 years of age. Men tend to settle down and start families around this age and job stability and carreer prospects are essential during this period. Unfair competition from foreign nationals would handicap local males and add to their already stressful lifestyles.

In addition, the human body goes into a physical decline after the age of 30. To keep our military personnel in top condition, it makes little sense in keeping men over the age of 30 in the frontline if military conflict does indeed breakout.

Increase volunteer, professional army

To compensate for the decrease in the number of active and reservist NSmen, the Singapore Armed Forces should expand volunteer army recruitment to complement the reduction in the number of conscripts.

In fact, the number of countries that have scrapped conscription are on the rise: Argentina (1994), Belgium (1994), Czech Republic (2004), France (1996), Hungary (2004), Italy (2004), Netherlands (1996), New Zealand (1972), Portugal (2004), and Spain (2001).

While Singapore may not be ready to follow suit, it would be prudent for us to reduce NSmen in favour of a professional military outfit

At the moment, NSmen are exploited for their services to glorify the PAP during National Day parades. The energy and time of these men can be put to more productive use than as entertainment for the PAP regime.

Conscientious objectors

What about people who do not believe that it is right for them to do military service due to moral, religious or ethical grounds? At the moment such conscientious objectors are charged and imprisoned for the length of their service.

In some of the countries that have compulsory military service, there is also a provision for conscientious objectors to serve in non-combat roles. There is an argument that this would open the flood gates for men to opt for non-combat positions. Such a loophole can be plugged by increasing the length of active service by, say, six months. The experiences of other countries like Germany and Sweden have not been negative in this aspect where males try to avoid combat service by claiming to be conscientious objectors.

Tranparency and openness

Obligation in Singapore seems to be a one-way street. While the Government holds the people accountable for their NS liabilities, the Ministry of Defence remains non-transparent and non-accountable in their dealings with the public.

The recent deaths of National Servicemen have opened a can of worms on training safety. In addition, the number of training fatalities and injuries are not made known to the public as a matter-of-course. The Government which compels the people to give their lives for the country are obliged to be absolutely transparent with information pertaining to safety issues. Compensation for deaths and injuries must also be reviewed and revised upwards.

The Government must also not exploit NSmen as cheap labour during major events such as the WB-IMF meeting or, possibly, the upcoming Youth Olympics. In must be remembered that the Enlistment Act was enacted for a specific purpose and any detraction from that purpose must be shunned.

Conclusion

When citizens are forced to serve in the military with the possibility of being killed if called to war, it is imperative that the government is a democratic one where citizens can hold the government accountable for its decisions and actions. Otherwise we may end up in a situation where wars are waged for the ruling elite rather than for the security and sovereignty of the nation.

STAYING TOGETHER, MOVING AHEAD

  • Reform Party Inauguration Dinner

MONKEY SEE, MONKEY DO…. BOYCOTT OPPOSITION…. VOTE PAP…

What About Swede way to boost Singapore’s Democracy

MM Lee Kuan Yew hinted at a recent dialogue that Singapore is reviewing its procreation policies. He revealed that possibly Singapore could be looking at the Swedish model. Read ST’s A Swede way to boost Singapore’s birth rate (July 11)

Perhaps it is also appropriate and timely for the PAP regime to review its not-so-democratic democracy by looking at the Swede’s political model. All factors remaining constant, it is probably due to Swedish democratic environment, resulting in a multiplier effect which boosted its birth rates?

Sweden’s parliament has 349 seats, of which 310 are ‘fixed seats’ in 20 constituencies and 39 members at a national level for ‘adjustment seats’. The latter is used to ensure that political parties have parliamentary representation proportional to their vote. Read about Swedish General Elections 2006 here.

Of course each system will have its own limitations. Having said that, since our million-dollar salaried PAP ministers eventually found inspiration and good examples in the Swedish procreation model, so how about Swedish democracy for Singapore?

Everly Brothers’ all I have to do is dream, subconsciously hums!

1st Day at work

Atlast…. Im working back… earning… happy for myself but yet…. can i make it? or am i yaya papaya?

I told Joe Sim my Operation Manager i try my  best. HOpefully I can. Quite a nice chap different from OM Johnny Lai….. Always used the F word till one day he kena a police report from me. But then he want to sue me but the Managing Director do not allow him to do so… Whatever…. forget the pass…. Lim & Lim days is over now JH…. JoE sIm.

Yes, Tian Chua was a friend to mine…. he was also unemployed last time…. Worth to struggle as opposition member and now he is MP but for us in Singapore. No chance… You be opposition… you die…. I rather don’t involve in politics.

Ok lor…. got to rest… want to see a new day tomorrow…

 

 

New Job, incidents etc…..

I just received a call from Mr Joe Sim the Operations Manager that interview me last few days to report to work tomorrow before 8am.

I will try my best but really hope I can make it. My only worries is the uniform and collegues. I hope they are the reasonables collegues but i quote Dr Yam’s words “The world out there is cruel” hence I must face with the real world.

On 29th June 2008 at around 1am, I tried to call Tian Chua, my intention was to just chat with him. I asked him, whether am i disturbing him and his answer was yes because he was in a meeting.Hmmmm…. meeting at 1am? what sort of meeting is that? Tried to call him again at 2am…. still in the meeting, atlast he sms me in at 245am saying that ” we in a major crisis”.

Earlier in the morning I asked Hamzah one of Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) members. What is happening? he mentioned about someone reported on Anwar (Msian ex DPM) sodomised him at Damansara condo?

But again….. Is it true or is he making up stories? because it is not easy to sodomised someone unless he/she agrees on it. or unless a rape is being done. Like restraining the victim etc… Why he was with Anwar at the 1st place in a condo? I really guess he was making up stories but lets the Msian Police make the decision.

I wont be online everyday starting from tomorrow. I want to work an earn a living… forget about the past… focus on the future.

 Tian Chua or his full name is CHua Tian Chang

 

Photos Of Chia Ti Lik

One Nation’s

Our Introduction

ONE NATION is a political party representing the people of Singapore who are concerned that their will is being ignored by the one party system. One Nation is committed to Singapore sovereignty, the Constitution & Government of the People by the People. Based on this we have developed objectives & policies reflecting the will of the people.

One Nation supports the maintenance of a democratic system of government based on restricting its size and levels of taxation to the minimum required to achieve efficient administration and the least possible intrusion into the lives of individuals, industry and commerce.

One Nation is strongly nationalistic in its world-view, seeking to put Singapore’s interests first and setting our own house in order before pursuing an international agenda.

The One Nation wholeheartedly believes in the unity of the opposition parties and commits itself wholly to such a cause.  It believes that a strong united opposition front would bring about maximum effectiveness and benefits to Singaporeans.  Only then, it can be a real force to challenge the might of the all powerful,  PAP government.

One Nation,  wish to see a two-party system eventually emerging in Singapore.  Only under such a political system can Singaporeans be assured of a truly democratic society as well as more check and balance for an accountable and transparent government.

 

« Previous entries